|
09-24-2010, 05:17 PM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Huntsville,AL
Posts: 182
|
170` vs 180` Thermostat tech
__________________
04 Torch Red-Auto Built 04/05/04 #6452 Drop in Amsoil, Redline synthetics SCT Bama tune Magnaflow X-pipe (w/spun converters)/SRS Catback w/Borla ProXS mufflers Vogtland springs/Koni Sport struts & shocks/MM HD Control Arms Steeda full length subframe connectors/Steeda 2 pt strut brace/Steeda CC Plates Stifflers 4 pt. k-member brace/Eibach sway bars FRPP aluminum driveshaft-removed dogbone/Urethane trans mount Brembo Sport Rotors/Hawk Ceramic/Goodridge Lines |
09-24-2010, 06:26 PM | #2 |
R.B. Phillips
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Westford MA
Posts: 279
|
Re: 170` vs 180` Thermostat tech
Nice link. Years ago (actually, Nixon was president) I would stove-test new thermostats in a saucepan of water. In today's world we don't look at the simple stuff such as this nearly enough. For this kind of change, my take is that you should make a good delta like 190 to 160 - don't bother stopping at 180.
Too often you can find it being asserted on boards that modern engines MUST have a certain thermostat so that gasoline doesn't was the cylinder walls, blah, etc., blah. We were reading the same things in 1970. Steel and iron alloys are tough, and life is short. Put in the thermostat you feel like. Our stock-type cars are very temperature-sensitive at the strip, and any head start you can give it in cooling off between rounds helps. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|