|
|
07-15-2011, 09:58 AM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 2,554
|
Re: Supercharged HP vs N/A HP
Oh good God guys, let it go. Both are harder on the motor than stock, leave it at that.
__________________
03 white Mach1 JLT RAI | 1/2 spacer | Catback | 4.56s 7.76@87.8mph |
07-15-2011, 12:01 PM | #2 |
not for long
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: santa rosa beach fl
Posts: 830
|
Re: Supercharged HP vs N/A HP
Amen Brother! High horsepower does not equal longevity any way you build it.
__________________
BB/S 324 kooks sully accufab cams heads valves bs3 ls1coils sully rails aeromotive regulator Weldon pump 8gal cell batt in trunk tko500(faceplated) spool upr k foxbody spindles metco upper an lowers 502rwhp. |
07-15-2011, 02:49 PM | #3 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 323
|
Re: Supercharged HP vs N/A HP
What about the longevity of new high hp cars? zo6 505hp N/A, shelby 550 F/I, with the up and coming ones having over 600 hp, Caddy and z28 have 550+ , zr1 640.
|
07-15-2011, 02:57 PM | #4 |
finally paid for
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ypsilanti Twp, Mi
Posts: 4,077
|
Re: Supercharged HP vs N/A HP
big motors first off...displacement almost twice ours with some of the motors (6.2l in the vette)...that is comparing apples to oranges.
__________________
2004 mach 1-turbo build in progress.. Fast xfi 2.0 OLD combo- 826rwhp/720 trq -100 shot NX 9.13@154 on 100 shot NEW- in progress... |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|